Quantcast
Channel: Andrew Drummond
Viewing all 810 articles
Browse latest View live

REVENGE PORN - ARREST WARRANT ISSUED FOR FAKE LAWYER BRIAN GOUDIE

$
0
0
KEY BAR AND GUEST HOUSE OWNER'S SECRET FILMS

An arrest warrant was today issued for fake Scots lawyer Brian Goudie by a court in Thailand on charges which included posting pornographic video of his former 19-year-old Thai assistant in the resort of Pattaya.

The warrant was issued by Pattaya Provincial Court after Goudie, 48, from Falkirk, failed to turn up to surrender to bail.

Goudie is currently on bail appealing a three year jail sentence for posing as a British barrister and former officer of the Royal Marines to cheat a 78-year-old American woman, Barbara Fanelli, from Madison, Wisconsin out of 7.8 million Thai baht (£142,369) which included bail money for her son who had been arrested in Pattaya.  Her son Gregory Miller, 44, died in custody.

He was born Brian Gerald James Goldie in Falkirk and under this name he was jailed for six years in Australia for stealing some AUS$400,000 from his employers, a West Australian mining company.

Having changed his name the former Royal Bank of Scotland teller described himself as a Barrister with a degree from Edinburgh University and a former Captain in the Royal Marines who had been wounded in Iraq.  He was neither.

The latest charges have been brought by Ms. BK (name redacted) whom Goudie made managing director of Jimmi International a company which owned a guest house and two apartments in Pattaya and which formerly belonged to former Ulster drugs trafficker Jimmy ‘Doc’ Halliday,   Halliday's assets in the UK were seized by the Serious Organised Crime Agency (now National Crime Agency).

Goudie secured the company by gaining Halliday’s power of attorney on his deathbed. Halliday died from the flesh eating disease necrotising fasciitis while in prison in Thailand, having been jailed for his part in a fight in a Pattaya nightclub.

Goudie transferred the managing directorship of Jimmi International the day after the bar an guest house then known as the 'Jaggie Thistle'  was raided by police and found not to have alcohol or entertainment licences.  As a result Ms BK was prosecuted.  This act is the subject of a further charge for which Goudie’s arrest warrant was issued.

While several countries including Canada, Israel, 27 states of the USA, and the United Kingdom and even the Philippines, have introduced laws criminalizing ‘Revenge Porn’ Thailand has not.
Goudie is being prosecuted under Thailand’s Computer Crime Act and criminal libel laws.

It is alleged that Goudie, who was in a relationship with Ms BK reacted badly at their split up. He posted stories on the net describing her as a US$10 prostitute and then posted a number of pornographic pictures and videos he had taken her at the guest house’, now trading as the U$15 a night Key Bar and Guest House in the Jomtien Complex, Pattaya, and also in a hotel room.
Goudie also features in the videos but his face is not shown.

Key Bar and Guest House
Dr. Laura Hilly and Kira Allmann of the Oxford Human Rights Hub commenting on the decision earlier this year by Google and Bing to remove links to Revenge Porn on request, described revenge porn as a kind of gendered hate speech designed to silence women and other gender, sexual, and racial minorities. Rather than promote free expression, as its defenders maintain, it stifles free expression and the internet needs protection from it.

Last April Californian Kevin Bollaert  who ran the revenge porn website ‘UGotPosted’ was sentenced to 18 years in prison and ordered to pay US$385,000 damages to his victim. The victim was under 18 when the pictures were taken.

Bollaert

“Sitting behind a computer, committing what is essentially a cowardly and criminal act, will not shield predators from the law or jail," said Attorney General Kamala Harris following the verdict.

Last year Goudie, who has repeatedly beenconfronted about his past announced he was suing Google for allowing internet harassment against him. However no action was taken.  An attempt to use the ‘Right to be Forgotten Ruling’ by the European Union also to have articles removed from the net about him also failed in  a Thai court.

The legal agent assisting Ms BK said: "Mr Goudie has publicly announced he has enough cash to pay for bail until the cows come home so we are surprised at his non appearance. Given his history we will strongly oppose bail if and when he surrenders."


GROUND BREAKING THAI COURT GIVES BAIL TO ALLEGED REPEAT DRUGS OFFENDER

$
0
0
A 40-year-old Australian national was granted bail by the Thai Region 2 Appeal Court today in the sum of 800,000 (AUS$30,573) on a charge of possessing ‘Ice’  - crystal methamphetamine.

Jacob Dade Davies from Melaney, Queensland, had earlier been refused bail by Pattaya Provincial Court, as earlier this year in case YO17/58 he had been convicted of possession of  a Class A drug fined 14,000 Thai baht (AUS$535.52) and given a 15 months prison sentence suspended for 2 years.

As the cash goes into the court if he breaks his bail terms and conviction could see him doing ten years in prison there is considerable speculation as to whether Mr.Davies will stick around for his trial.

In court as guarantor was Australian Scotsman David John Hanks, 66, former owner of ‘The Masquerades brothel in Keysborough, Victoria.

Hanks, now a moneylender on a retirement visa was acquitted earlier this year or racketeering charges.  It was alleged that he charged 60 per cent per month for his loans to Russians in the resort.

Hanks’ partner fellow Scot Brian Goudie, formerly Goldie,  did not attend. He was due to surrender in a nearby court on a charges relating to revenge porn on a former woman partner and setting her up to face licensing charges.

Normally those arrested on drugs charges in Thailand have little chance of getting bail. The maximum penalty for drugs offences is death by lethal injection.

But Pattaya Court and its associated appeal court are renowned for its ground breaking legal decisions.

The legal victory for Davies, born on May 16 1975, comes as even a greater surprise as his senior adviser Goudie, is currently appealing a three year jail sentence for posing as a lawyer to cheat an elderly female client out of 7.8 million Thai baht (Aus$300,000) a large part of which was bail money for her son.


Triumphant legal team Hanks and Goudie with former lawyer

MANGO MIGRANTS AND TERRORIST ROUTE INTO THAILAND?

$
0
0
Finnwatch – the consumer rights organization which brewed up a storm over the mistreatment of Burmese migrant labour at Natural Fruit’s pineapple processing plant in Prachuap Khiri Kan is at it again – this time attacking working conditions of Burmese in factories supplying to one of Finland’s cut price supermarket chains.

In a report rather weakly titled:‘On the Borderline of Responsibility’ they have focused on suppliers to the Tokmanni supermarket chain. 

Tokmanni has only 150 or so outlets so takes only about one per cent of the products from the Thai companies' names, so this is not going to grab any headlines until some major conglomerates are hit.




But nevertheless the report is quite interesting in that it confirms what we all know and carries the usual Thai outright denials.  The Thai companies under the spotlight are ‘The Great Oriental Food Products’ and its  factory in Mae Sot on the Burmese border, and Zenith Infant Products in Samut Sakorn.



When I saw the name I had visions of the Thai company using infants to mould baby bottles and comforters as Thailand has been long been in the ‘You just won’t believe this’ genre of holiday destinations. But alas no.

The report basically catalogues the usual complaints of payments below the minimum wage level, illegal overtime rates, lack of registration of workers etc. You can read it here.

But what caught my attention was the Great Oriental Food Company’s factory in Mae Sot.

According to the report none of the workers interviewed had, government ID cards, work permits, or even Visas!



In fact a Finnwatch researcher called the company and was told he did not need any ID. Just turn up and they would give him a company ID.

Mae Sot is of course on the Burmese border and the work force just walks 100 yards across the bridge from Myawaddy.

Eventually the company admitted this was possible as Mae Sot was in a Special Economic Zone and these workers were subject to a relaxed migrant worker employment policies.

Finnwatch researched this and found it was all a bit of flam. An agreement has been discussed with Burma but not signed, but workers, some of whom were paid just 120 baht per day – less than half Thailand’s minimum wage, would still need special border passes and would need to apply for a work permit, undergo health checks, and secure medical insurance.

None of the workers at the Great Oriental Fruit Company even have a company contract, stated the report.

Russian has of course put out an alert of possible strikes by IS or DAESH in Thailand. The Thai Policer say they have no evidence of any such terrorists entering the country. 

As I write of course 1000 IS terrorists could be crossing the Mywaddy Bridge dressed in longyis and carrying C-4 in their lunch boxes.

Or they could go upstream and pay the DKBA (Democratic Karen Buddhist Army) 1000 kyats for a pass.

But why would they bother? (They would not want to be mistaken for Rohingyas)

Flying Sporran's Diary
Thailand’s Immigration Police Department is the most corrupt in the country, according to the outgoing police chief. (And it undoubtedly has the largest foreign criminal population in south east Asia.)

After all the Bangkok bombers, or rather those accused of the bombing at the Erawan Shrine, merely paid for their visas under the table.

I’m guessing some Immigration Chief in Northern Thailand is getting his Christmas presents as usual this year.

DREW NOYES KICKED OUT OF BED BY FRAUD VICTIM

$
0
0
FAMOUS FRAUDSTER RAGES AS FORMER SCHOOL PAL MOVES IN WITH HIS WIFE


Convicted fraudster Drew Noyes who fled Thailand with some of his children while on bail has announced yet again that he will return – this time he says ‘to claim what's rightfully mine’.

On his Facebook site which he heads ‘My life is dedicated to my children’ the former publisher of the Pattaya Times newspaper smiles cheerfully as he cooks hamburgers for his kids and also advertises his bogus One Stop Legal Services business which he ran with his common law wife Wanrapa Boonsu.

Boonsu, known as Kung, was convicted with him of embezzlement and extortion and like Noyes jailed for two years. Both are on bail appealing.

Unfortunately for Noyes, the One-Stop business in Pattaya is not his anymore.

.......Nor for that matter is his wife in this truth is stranger than fiction story.

Kung has taken up home with a former victim of Drew Noyes who claimed Noyes swindled him out of US$250,000.  The pair have been on holiday to Kanchanaburi, and are reported to be madly in love.

Goulet identifies Noyes and Wanrapa after their arrest


One could be forgiven for thinking that Noyes’ former victim has a wry smile on his face. But where is this going?

Noyes has been furiously texting threats to him from North Carolina where he was first exposed as a fraud by the Wilmington Morning Star, now known simply as ‘The Star’ in Wilmington, NC.
The American who went to Jefferson High School, Jefferson City, TN, with Noyes  however is unperturbed and looking forward to a face to face meeting. He has told friends that he will not stop until Noyes is groveling in the dirt.

Now Noyes has to bite weapons instructor's bullet

He was ripped off by Noyes being charged five times the value of an apartment at Keha Condo in Thepprasit Road, Jomtien, which was built by Thailand’s National Housing Authority for disadvantaged Thais.  (In what other country can you witness the authorities greedily lining their pockets by selling housing meant for the poor to rich tourists?)

Noyes had also cheated him in the purchase what was agreed would be a small hotel in Pattayaland but which turned out to be 'Cupid's' a hostess club which never opened and cash also went into thge Athena Gentle's Man Club (sic) club in Jomtien which remains unsold.  This planned ‘knocking shop’ failed to open its doors to one customer and anyone interested should know that the building is in hock to the bank.

Kung, an active partner in Noyes’ scams in Pattaya, is now playing the victim and has a new shoulder to cry on. The American a former weapons instructor and US Naval policeman believes she is an innocent party who fell under Noyes’ influence. He will support her, he says, even if/when she goes to jail. She is a private person, he says.

Critics of Kung says she was not so private when she offered to hold foreigners' houses in her name, to stop their Thai wives getting them, and when she aided him in his other scams. Its unlikely they will nor pursue her further.





The American victims says he will pursue Noyes in the United States.

Although she was convicted with Noyes of attempting to extort Dr Michel Goulet of the Thonglor Clinic out of 7.8 million Thai baht a legal assistant has reported to this site that particular incriminating evidence in which police witnessed a phone call from Wanrapa ordering Goulet to pay up quickly....or else, appears not to be in the court file.

This could of course have merely been incompetence by the prosecutor, who curiously unlike other regions of Thailand, has not been rotated for years.

Scott Gold, formerly of the Morning Star now with the LA Times, would chuckle at the picture of Noyes cooking burgers. In his exposé of Noyes in April 1995 under the headline ‘Trouble Follows Developer’ apart from Noyes’s share scams, property scams, and sexual harassment, he discovered that Noyes’s CV was a ‘myriad of lies’.

Noyes had boasted that he was one of the directors of the World Fair in Knoxville. In fact Noyes was there to help a friend out with a rib stand.

On his Facebook page he claims he studied the Foreign Business Act and Property at the Thai Ministry of Commerce. You can take that with a couple of dollops of barbecue sauce.


DECLARATION: Wanrapa Boonsu sued the author in two cases brought for criminal libel and computer crime act libel for publishing the picture below which shows her and Noyes under the caption 'Going to Jail' and Niels Colov publisher of the Pattaya People under the caption 'Been to Jail'. Colov, head of Pattaya Police Foreign Volunteer Assistants served time in Copenhagen for a number of offences including pimping and beating up as prostitute. Boonsu lost both cases.




PATTAYA'S CRIMINAL FRATERNITY RAISE A GLASS TO AN OLD FRIEND

$
0
0
 GANGSTER FRIEND OF PATTAYA POLICE VOLUNTEERS BOWS OUT IN COPENHAGEN

Owild - 'women loved him''
Scandinavian gangsters in the Thai resort city of Pattaya, Thailand, have been raising a glass of schnapps this week to their old friend career criminal Leon Owild who died aged 75 in a suburb of North West Copenhagen after a long illness.

Owild for a while was a charismatic character in the Danish underworld smuggling cheap cigarettes in from Poland to Denmark. 

After he ‘retired’ he was elected President of KRIM an organization set up to help people fight injustice in the Danish legal system.

But it seems the old leopard could not change his spots, because he had to be kicked out when he was arrested for drugs smuggling and sent back to jail. 

Women loved him, the Danish Ekstra Bladet newspaper reported, and he boasted ten lovers at the same time and a daughter in Pattaya – now aged 15.

Owild’s criminal roots were grounded in Vesterbro, the former red light area of Copenhagen,  where his friends Niels Colov and Lonne Fristrup Jensen were both pimps.

(Picture: Lonne, Jensen and Leon Owil on the left - Colov on the right 


All three ended up in the sex resort of Pattaya along with Danish bank robber Rene Larsen.  Both Larsen and Jensen were arrested – and Jensen was deported.  But Larsen made his own way back to Copenhagen after mysteriously escaping and announced he would rather do his time there.

Niels Colov meanwhile in Thailand is reported to have undergone a conversion. He became a Buddhist and a vegetarian, President of the Pattaya-Jomtien Rotary Club, owner of the Pattaya People Media company, and of course Group Leader of the Foreign Police Volunteer Assistants.

His criminal record for violence, duress, receiving stolen property, and pimping in Vesterbro, was wiped under Denmark’s rehabitation laws. This was because he had not committed an offence for an extended period in Denmark.

This may of course because he had been committed his offences in Pattaya where he received the blessing of the local police and they enjoyed his entertainments.

Complaints had been made about him in connection to  allegations of extortion involving advertisers to the Pattaya People Media group but none were ever made subject to any investigation.  He also set about gathering numerous awards for services to the community and frequently announced his charity donations.

The publishers claiming to running Pattaya. Left Colov with Lone and right Noyes with his wife Wanrapa


For a while Colov had a rival in American Drew Walter Noyes, who had been exposed as a fraudster in the United States, but who arrived in Thailand claiming to be both a lawyer and financial adviser to the Bank of Thailand.

In fact Noyes, a well known con man, owned a couple of beer bars called Lollipop and Zebra before starting a 'law firm' and a rival newspaper 'The Pattaya Timesa' to attract punters to his property and legal advice scams.
Rene Larsen

The two went to war with each other publicly accusing each other or being criminals and even of wife beating.

Colov sued Noyes for libel and also stealing his business directory and Noyes apologised and the two made a pact often being seen shaking hands in public.  

Noyes left Thailand this year for the United States and is currently on bail for extortion having been convicted and jailed for two years.

He was convicted of attempting to extort the Thonglor Clinic in Jomtien out of 7 million baht.  That was the price joint owner Michael Goulet was told he had to pay to do business in Pattaya.

Both Noyes and Colov helped each other with contacts to city officials, senior police, and army officials. Both apparently agreed to help police identify foreign criminals in the resort and had set up arrangements with the now publicly disgraced Crime Suppression Division.

The Pattaya People carried in its pages numerous property scams in which punters were fooled into buying holiday and retirement homes which would never be built while Colov awarded himself an UNESCO Cross for his services to the community,  (No such award exists), and even bought a Papal blessing.

He also got local city officials to join the Knights of Rizal, an organization celebrating Philippines independence hero Jose Rizal.

Earlier this year Colov entertained Scandinavian Bandidos leader Brian Sandberg, a career drugs trafficker, and he also introduced them to city officials who 'liked motorbikes'.

Colov  with new 'wife' and Brian Sandberg


Owild, Larsen, Jensen, and Colov put the Danish criminal fraternity on the map in Thailand long before the enclaves in Kata, Phuket and could in some ways be said to have helped the ball rolling into the city taking over from Southern Spain as the world’s ‘Costa del Crime’.

Skặll! Leon

THAI JUSTICE ON TRIAL AGAIN AS BURMESE AWAIT THEIR FATE IN 'PARADISE'

$
0
0




With just two days to go before the court in Koh Samui, Thailand, returns a verdict on the two young Burmese accused of the murders of David Miller and Hannah Witheridge on Koh Tao the defence pro-bono lawyers, appointed by the Lawyers Council of Thailand, and the Migrant Workers Rights Network have put out a statement detailing why Wai Phyo and Zaw Lin should be acquitted.

This is not a good time for Thailand.  A series of reports critical of its treatment of migrant workers in the fruit industry, shrimp peeling industry, and fishing fleets, plus officials connivance in human trafficking, repeated deaths of foreigners under suspicious circumstances, the country’s automatic denials, and not least of all the botched investigation of these two young Burmese, has caused irreparable harm to its already questionable image.

The most trouble aspect of this case is not the botched investigation. By western standards pretty much all Thai police investigations would not pass muster.  It is the statements issued not only by the head of the Royal Thai Police claiming Scotland Yard had congratulated them on a job well done but statements issued through the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office pretty much suggesting that the Thai police investigation was kosher – when of course now the whole world knows it was not.



The Scotland Yard report of course must remain under wraps due to the ‘chilling effect’ factors involved which have already been exclusively reported here.. Had the report been published I am pretty sure that it would have been ripped to shreds.  And the ‘chilling effect’ would not be that it would harm relationships between the British and Thai Police (both need each other) but the naivety of British police officers who were sent by Prime Minister David Cameron to ‘observe’.

There are few people in Thailand who have confidence in its justice system. There are few people who do not believe it can be managed by outside influences.

The prosecutor in Koh Samui seems to be one of the island's fixed assets. He also has overseen the case of Jack Hansen-Bartel, a truly horrific story of injustice not only detailed on this website but widely in the Australian media.

In the UK and Australia the prosecutor and police would be publicly admonished by the judges for presenting such a mish mash of incomplete and certainly not transparent evidence. But this is Thailand and worse, this is Koh Samui.



Here follows the statement:

A team of pro-bono lawyers working under the Lawyers Council of Thailand (LCT) to defend two Myanmar migrant workers accused of the rape and murder of a female British tourist and the murder of a British male tourist on Koh Tao Island, Thailand in September. 2014 together with the accused themselves await the upcoming verdict of Koh Samui Court on the case.
 
The court made an appointment for both parties in the case to hear the verdict, to be read at 9am on 24th December 2015. This hearing is the final part of a one year effort in court by a core team of 7 Thai lawyers supported by. Burmese, Australian and British translators, assistants and advisors to ensure a fair trial and adequate defense for the accused. 
Case witness testimony that ended 11th October 2015 after 21 days of witness hearings involving 34 witnesses and thousands of pages of evidence has already been widely publicised by media. The court in October then appointed both parties to the case to hear the verdict on 24th December 2015.

Hannah Witheridge (23) and David Miller (24) were murdered on 15th September 2014 on Koh Tao, a tourist island in the Gulf of Thailand. The murder investigation was widely criticised both domestically and internationally due to alleged mishandling of forensic evidence and alleged torture both of the two accused and migrant workers living on Koh Tao Island. The challenges faced to Thailand's law enforcement and justice systems in this case also cast a serious shadow over the safety of tourism in Thailand.

On 2nd October 2014, Zaw Lin and Wai Phyo (Win Zaw Htun), 22 year old migrant workers from Rakhine state in Myanmar, were arrested for immigration offences. Additional charges were then laid against them during questioning for rape, murder and theft related to the killings of Hannah Witheridge and David Miller. The two accused signed confessions during interrogation and also publicly and during questioning re-enacted the crimes.

On 14th October 2014, at a first advance witness hearing in the case, both accused then retracted their confessions to LCT lawyers. Later on defense lawyers received information that the two accused alleged beatings and torture were used during their detention, prior to sending on for questioning by investigation officials, to elicit their confessions made involuntarily. The Migrant Worker Rights Network (MWRN) and rights groups called on the LCT to provide trained lawyers for the accused to ensure they could adequately defend themselves against all the charges so as to ensure a fair trial and also importantly to guard against a potential miscarriage of. justice in such a highly publicised and tragic case.

Two month's delay in prosecuting the accused resulted from extensive media and diplomatic attention towards the case in addition to calls for justice by the accused, their families and the wider public. This resulted in further questioning of the accused that confirmed both maintained complete innocence and insisted their confessions came about involuntary as a result of torture. Multiple criminal charges were then filed against Zaw Lin and Wai Phyo on 4th December 2014 by the Koh Samui prosecutor at Koh Samui Court. The judges heeded calls for adequate time to prepare a thorough defense for the accused and, after preliminary evidence exchange hearings, a 21-day trial eventually commenced on 8th July 2015, with 3 days extension granted in the hearings.

A closing statement submitted in October 2015 to Koh Samui Court outlined in detail key planks of the defense team's arguments, presented during testimony of its 13 witnesses in court, concerning to what extent the defense witnesses should be seen as credible by the court. The closing statement considered the testimony of the prosecution witnesses so as to compare the reliability of this witness testimony alongside that of the defense witnesses also for the court's benefit in issuing a judgement on the case. The statement highlighted as follows:

(1) The case questioning and charging of the accused prior to prosecution was unlawful. The accused questioning after arrest and the process of notifying them of the charges against them were incorrect. The accused were questioned as 'witnesses' but it turned out as a confession that stated they confessed to murder and rape. The accused were questioned without lawyers or trusted persons present. The accused were not read their rights as criminal suspects or explained the nature of offences they were charged with. Neither were the accused provided adequate translation and legal representation as required by law and as was reasonable in the circumstances. The accused's DNA samples were taken from them involuntarily and are hence inadmissible as evidence in court.
(2) The accused's original confessions during questioning cited by the prosecution in court came about involuntarily from torture or abuse that made them fear for their lives and safety in the context of a wider case investigation when migrant workers reported systematic abuse on Koh Tao Island. These written confessions, even if they had been signed, should not be considered by the Court. Other documents that were also written for the accused and which they involuntarily signed not even understanding what they were signing likewise should not be considered by the court. The videoed or staged re-enactments undertaken by the accused and submitted by the prosecution to the Court were likewise involuntary, staged under threat of violence and should not be considered or should be inadmissible as evidence in court.
(3) There is no link between the alleged murder weapon (a hoe) and the accused. DNA samples from the hoe do not match the accused DNA profiles but instead match the DNA profiles of other individuals.
(4) The DNA evidence allegedly matching the accused as well as all surrounding or circumstantial evidence in this case apparently showing the guilt of the accused is unreliable and should be inadmissible and not considered by the Court. All of this evidence was not collected, tested or analysed in accordance with internationally accepted standards such as ISO 17025. This evidence should not be considered as satisfying beyond reasonable doubt that the accused violently raped and murdered the female deceased or murdered the male deceased. This includes all evidence linking the accused to the alleged crime scene such as cigarette butts, theft of the male deceased's mobile phone and sunglasses as well as a 'running man' caught on CCTV.
(5) The prosecution case is marked by an absence of significant evidence needed to prove the guilt of the accused for crimes they are charged with. This absent evidence includes photographs of the crime scene, autopsy and DNA analysis processes, chain of custody documents for forensic evidence, certain forensic evidence documents as well as detailed DNA analysis laboratory case notes. In addition, the clothes and the body surface of the female deceased expected to contain significant traces of DNA of the perpetrators were either not tested at all or tested but not included in the prosecution file or case evidence list. CCTV footage provided by the prosecution seemed to be incomplete and no fingerprint or footprint evidence was presented as part of the prosecution case.

The conclusion of the closing statement is the opinion of the two accused in calling for the Court to issue a judgement on 24th December 2015 dismissing 

HAPPY CHRISTMAS ONE AND ALL!

$
0
0
Aha. I never thought I would be one for those cheesy family Christmas cards but there I was in Tesco's in Kingston Bagpuize when I heard this high octave 'Ho! Ho! Ho! and 'Have your picture taken with Santa for three quid!'

Seemed like a good deal to me. The Santa was actually a woman as we are living in the world of true gender equality, but dad never got to sit on her knee, because we are living in the world of true gender equality. So here you have it. All done in three minutes. So Merry Christmas one and all.

And a Happy New Year, when hopefully we will be slaying a few more dragons.

PS. The haircuts were three quid too


SCAM WARNING! HOLIDAY INSURANCE IN THAILAND. WHO NEEDS IT?

$
0
0
BECAUSE YOU ARE THAILAND?*


Sorry to be an old misery so close to Christmas but I need to put out a warning on a current ‘Thai insurance scam’ as the country is entering into peak tourist season.

The headline is not intended to mislead. Everyone should get health and accident insurance. That's a given.

But insurance against loss of valuables can be a double edged sword. Best bring nothing to Thailand except a cheap laptop or smart phone and be willing to write it off. Of if you do keep under lock and key.

Unfortunately this is a scam carried out by the police and the courts – and the most notable case was that of Jason Sudra from London, a supermarket manager, who was banged up for a month in Nong Plalai jail, Pattaya, without even seeing a judge.

This scam happens when tourists go to police and claim they were attacked and robbed.  They can get the reply that police have checked CCTV and no such incident has taken place – so you must be taking part in a holiday insurance scam…Bang! The keys go in the cell door and the hapless victim will soon be begging for mercy.

In cases reporter the foreigner will be asked to sign a statement saying he will go to court and everything will be settled with a 500 baht fine (ten quid) and having spent time in custodu the victim will be more than willing.

At the court in the cases mentioned foreigners will not actually be brought before a judge. They will be asked to sign some paperwork in Thai - and Bob's your uncle they have signed their own prison  sentence.

The Sudra case was particularly abhorrent. He remonstrated with a policeman in a hotel lobby who was sorting out a ‘ladyboy’ who claimed she had been underpaid by a punter – and told the policeman he had been robbed on the Beach Road, Pattaya, which was true, but he had already written off the incident as it was only a cheap camera and watch and mobile phone he lost.

He was charged with carrying out an insurance scam – and he did not even have travel insurance for theft – just health.

The police gave him a price for his acquittal which he refused to pay.

He spent a month in jail before an intervention was made and was subject to headlines like the one on the right.

Similar things have been happening in tourist areas of southern Thailand and in one new case a young Brit was banged up. I cannot give details as this case is not over. But its going to cost upwards of £10,000.

But think carefully before going to Thai police with any complaint. There are some good ones, but it’s not worth chancing your luck. If you need to make a report for an insurance claim, bring someone with you at all times.

If you have the misfortune to have a lawyer – do not go for the first one who happens to appear to help you.  You will need another lawyer to get your cash back from him.

Oh - and avoid bringing British fifty pound notes to Thailand and trying to cash them at a tourist kiosk.  Some of these operators have fake notes.  You could suddenly find yourself in a lock up in a scam worked with local police...begging to give money to be allowed to go free. Don't think you'll be any safer by going to a kiosk of any of the big trading or Thai high street banks. 

* Because you are Thailand - Prime Minister Prayuth Chan-Ocha's latest patriotic song release calling on citizens to defend the country against an unperceived enemy.

--- Article Removed ---

$
0
0
***
***
*** RSSing Note: Article removed by member request. ***
***

THE KOH TAO MURDERS - IF THE VERDICT WAS WRONG TIME WILL NOT TELL

$
0
0
By the six o’clock BBC evening news in London yesterday the mews that Wai Phyo and Zaw Lin had been found guilty and sentenced to death was well down the agenda, coming after a car crash with one fatality, floods in Cumbria and a bus crash with no fatalities.

Any doubt about the prosecution of the two Burmese was dealt with by the brother of David Miller who was murdered together with Hannah Witheridge on the Thai island of Koh Tao was swiftly dealt a blow with the statement by Miller’s brother, read outside the court.

“We believe the result today represents justice for David and Hannah,” said Mr. Miller. “It is our opinion that the evidence against Zaw Lin and Wai Phyo is overwhelming. They raped to satisfy their selfish desires and murdered to cover up that fact. They have shown no remorse. We believe the correct verdict has been reached.”

The defence, were, well defensive, Andy Hall of the Migrant Workers Rights Association who had been co-ordinating with pro-bono lawyers from the Lawyers Council of Thailand, prefaced his comments by saying that he ‘respected the decision of the court’ a phrase I have had to use in the past to preface remarks about an abominable injustice in the Thai courts.

“The defence team position is that the DNA evidence as presented at trial was unreliable and was not collected, analysed and reported in accordance with international standards like ISO17025. This is the same for other case evidence. Significant evidence like Hannah's clothes etc. were not even presented in court and/or even perhaps tested by the investigation officials.  
The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused were involved in the horrific crimes of which they were charged. On that basis the charges should have been dismissed and the now convicted men released. We will appeal and remain confident in the Thai legal system to deliver justice.”

To criticize the judgment could of course have warranted the critic a jail sentence. This is not allowed in Thailand. It is contempt. Judges who may be under 30 years old with only 2 years  law practice behind them have some of the same status as royalty, or even deity.  They are not addressed ‘M’Lud’ but “I am dust under your feet”.

Nevertheless the defence statement had all the aura of appearing to get the defendants off on technicalities. In the Thai system of justice and prosecution presentation gaffs and cockups, and even false testimony, are common.

It does not necessarily mean the defendants are innocent (though they would be acquitted in the west). It merely means that the police and prosecutor are often unaware of laws, procedures, or often just plain lazy and expect to be believed in a system where guilt is assumed before innocence.


It is good that the parents of the victims seem to have closure. It would be horrific if that closure came at the cost of two innocent lives.

I personally have never believed the police case. That was not because I was sold on the appearance of the two young Burmese who looked like they could hardly lift a hoe against the victims (and there was no evidence they did).

No this is south East Asia. The promotion of Buddhist ideals and love of all human creatures does exist but when murders happen they can be of the most obscene and violent in their nature; - frighteningly savage. And the Thai murder rate knocks spots off British statistics.


From a western point of view George Orwell can testify how inscrutable the Burmese can get. Any inmate of a Thai jail can tell you jhow savage the Thais can be.

In earlier days I might have said: “Time will tell”.  I won’t because time will not tell on this one. That’s just the way it is.  “Truth will never die,” goes the Thai expression, "but if you tell it you may certainly die.”

No-one in Thailand is going to come crawling out of the island jungle to reverse a court judgment.

Politically the problem is solved.

Does Scotland Yard have the answer? Are they sure that the DNA of the Burmese was found in Hannah and that no hamming was going on?

Perhaps now the trial is over they can say – after all that is not going to have a ‘Chilling Effect’ on Anglo-Thai police relations, which is why their report was not made available.

If the Thai police have laid a false DNA trail it will not be the first time. They were caught in the act trying to extract semen from a Burmese tour guide during the investigation of Kirsty Jones, who was murdered and raped in Chiang Mai nearly 15 years ago.

When that act was exposed their investigation appeared to collapse.   And that’s just another or many murders in which it looks like time will not tell in Thailand.

And like the cases of Hannah and David Kirsty’s mother knows that there are people out there who know the killer.

THE KOH TAO DEATH SENTENCES - THE REAL CHILLING EFFECT

$
0
0
ONE LAW FOR THE UK - ANOTHER FOR BURMESE MIGRANT WORKERS

The performance by Michael Miller outside the court in Koh Samui last week, in which he berated the two young Burmese sentenced to death for the murder of his brother and murder and rape of Hannah Witheridge on the Thai island of Koh Tao for showing 'not a sign of remorse', is beginning to sound rather hollow in the wake of almost universal distrust at the outcome of the trial.

While the Millers and Scotland Yard have publicly supported the Thai authorities, the overwhelming international consensus appears to be that both Wai Phyo and Zaw Lin, were indeed tortured and set up by Thai police as scape goats to protect Thailand’s lucrative tourist trade. 

The family of Hannah Witheridge has perhaps correctly decided to hold fire on any comment.

Even the BBC has conveyed concern at the verdict on the Koh Tao murders.  

A report by Jonathan Head, the BBCs south east Asia correspondent on the BBC’s website cast even more doubt on Thai police evidence, if any were needed,  and quotes an Australian forensic scientist, Jane Taupin, whom the defence decided not to present, whose testimony could have sealed whatever credibility remained of the Thai police DNA investigation.



Head also criticises the ‘bafflingly non-adversarial tactics’ of the defence. None of the witnesses were put through a grilling the like of which we might see in a British court.  


Perhaps he meant; why wasn’t chief investigator Police Colonel Chiewpreecha Kerdprong questioned further when asked (a) why he did not investigate an allegation of a confrontation between the two victims and an ‘influential Thai’ earlier in the evening and (b) why did he not check the CCTV of people leaving on the first boats off the island in the morning?  To which he replied to both: “I did not consider it important”.

Actually it is not in Thai nature to be adversarial. This is not necessarily due to the benign nature of the Thai people. No, they can be very adversarial if the target is not around. 

They just know that if they are adversarial to another Thai, in court or out, that is going to come back to them five-fold and when they least expect it.

So here we have a case where Thailand’s Chief Forensic Scientist Porntip Rojanasund appears for the defence, is seen contradicting and exposing the police DNA evidence, and who actually finds DNA on the murder weapon, which police cannot find; a case where the actual DNA which has allegedly been lost; where video of a ‘running man’ has been a total red herring; but most of all where all evidence could have been manipulated or planted and a case in which the Thai government had already decided who the culprits are and made an announcement to say so.

Truth is not a forte of Thai government statements such as there is ‘no bird flu’ or ‘no human trafficking’, no ‘injudicial executions (Thaksins’ drug war in 2004), and the best known ‘There are no sex venues in Thailand.’

Further, evidence has been presented without corroboration by an organization which to all intents and purposes is Crime Inc. – the very core of which (the Central Investigation Bureau and Crime Suppression Division was exposed last year as responsible for syndicates controlling everything from oil to the trafficking in wildlife.

And further the evidence has been presented in a legal system based on British criminal law, which dropped the presumption of innocence in favour or presumption of guilty, abolished juries, and gave little hope to anyone with no clout – for instance Burmese migrant workers, perhaps one of the world’s worst treated migrant labour forces.

Would the Thai Police set up Burmese for this crime?  Well, they set up Burmese every day for something, as they do in Koh Tao, and they have certainly set Burmese up for murder. But I have never heard of an investigation of murder of a Burmese in Thailand. And many do not go home.



In a quarter century in Thailand I have covered probably every controversial murder where a Briton has been involved.  


Without exception in all cases I have been asked by Thai police? ‘Will this affect tourism?’ Actually it has not so far, certainly not over the long term, but none considered how offensive the question was each time.


Kirsty Jones

I do not mind repeating that when Kirsty Jones, from Brecon, was murdered and raped in Chiang Mai, police kidnapped a Karen tour guide and under torture he was ordered to masturbate so police could insert evidence into the crime scene.

But that would never have come out had not a Thai journalist with a conscience tipped me off. He could not run the story in his own newspaper, because he would never be able to work in the city again.


Kelvin Bourke and Sheri McFarlane

Similarly Thai police also set up two hill-tribe Chinese Haw migrants to take the rap for the murder of Australian student Kelvin Bourke and the rape of his girlfriend Sheri McFarlane in northern Thailand in 2000.

Their lawyer Wirachai Wangkahaemsuk described his clients as scapegoats for a crime that local police were under enormous pressure to resolve quickly, because of damage to the tourism industry. They were acquitted at the appeal court.

Scotland Yard is an honourable institution with an impressive worldwide reputation. And that is what their counsel said when they objected to the Metropolitan Police handing over their report to the defence when a petition was made to the High Court.  The British Police report had supported the Thai police’s version of what happened.

This was a ‘chilling effect’ case. It was argued by the Scotland Yard that to hand over the report would have a ‘substantial and adverse effect on law enforcement, fulfilment of public policy and the UK’s security objectives’.


In Case No: HQ15X0311,Queen Bench Division, Justice Green posed the following scenario, and it is worth repeating now because it was so prophetic.

"A foreign prosecutor fails to disclose to a defendant a key piece of evidence of great value to the defendant in a criminal case.  This item is however recorded in an MPS (Met Police) report and amounts to personal data.   
 
“The report explains that there is compelling evidence that the foreign forensic scientists employed by the police abroad have mixed up DNA samples.  It also records that the prosecution are nonetheless seeking to rely in court upon the wrong DNA evidence to inculpate the accused.  
“This entry might be pivotal to the defence and might quite literally represent a matter of life or death.  In those circumstances does the Court sacrifice the accused for the wider principle of comity and trust between authorities? 
“ The MPS submitted that such was the power and force of the public interest objectives the MPS advanced that even in such extreme circumstances the public interest would still trump the private interest.  
“Does the court sacrifice the accused for the wider principle of comity and trust between authorities?”
In effect, according to last week's judgment, it did.

As he made his ruling rejecting the application he said:


“I cannot ignore the fact that this is a death penalty case conducted with the accused arguing with their eyes closed.’… 

“ I feel considerable unease. I sit a long way from the seat of the trial and do not have a true hands-on feeling for the way evidence has been tendered by the prosecution or the main lines of defence.”

Indeed Justice Green had absolutely no idea what was being undone in the court in Koh Samui.

I am not suggesting that Scotland Yard knew of any evidence being tampered with of course. 

After all, as was made clear in the High Court, British police were not present at any interviews, were not witness to any DNA procedures, and were reliant on the documents and videos placed in front of them and what they were told through a Thai police interpreter, or English speaking Thai officers.

The Scotland Yard report did however state that the two young Burmese confessed in front of a judge and counsel.

We know that not to be true.

The Koh Samui judges also ruled that the two young Burmese had not been tortured, when torture and confession is quite the traditional Thai police method of investigation. But other Burmese villages on Koh Tao WERE tortured and there are photographs of their injuries.

On Facebook today an anonymous appeal went out to the parents of the victims to take heed of the fact that despite the judgment they should take heed of the discredited evidence in this case. The appeal  goes on to name the alleged  ‘real culprits’.

The website Change.org also carried that account by 'anonymous' presumably because the author has some connection with Thailand, plus a petition to PM David Cameron.

And following protests and border closures the Burmese Government has also called for a review of the case.  

In Britain at own at my local corner shop even the shopkeeper asks when I bring up the subject: ‘Were those the Burmese boys who were set up?’

So the statement by David Miller’s brother Michael Miller seems to have come from a different trial from that attended by the media in this case. Have the foreign media have an axe to grind?




As for the ‘chilling effect’ which the lawyers for Scotland Yard refer to, the question is  “Would this harm relations with the Thai police?’

The Thai police are currently are hosting a vast array of British criminals who know Thailand is a country they can safely operate from providing they cross the right palms.



But the Thai authorities are not shy in quoting every cough and spit a foreign police officer tells them to the local media quite often adding their own gloss such as 'we read from the same books as Scotland Yard'.

No the ‘chilling effect’ is this.  There are safeguards in British law which are there for good reason. 

British police forces have to send forensics to independent Home Office laboratories.  There are other legal procedures and evidential rules, which are in place so that justice is not achieved by short cuts and brute force.

Even were these two young Burmese to be guilty, to allow them to go to their deaths, or even life imprisonment (Thailand will show ‘magnanimity’ and reduce the sentence to life later if they are not acquitted on appeal) for Britain to condone such a judgment in the light of the shoddy investigation would show Kant hypocrisy.

For even in Britain even, where we do not like to see criminals get off by using the laws introduced to safeguard justice, we stand by presumption of innocence and fair play.

Refs/links

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-35170419

http://www.andrew-drummond.com/2015/09/the-chilling-effect-koh-tao-suspects.html

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/archive/news/hill-tribe-men-set-up-for-rape-murder-of-aussies/story-e6frg6t6-1111114342679

https://www.change.org/p/david-cameron-independently-investigate-the-horrific-murders-of-hannah-witheridge-and-david-miller?tk=j61c30DjwXajTdn9OUjY41haEuvjgUUkyUoqTKoFebY&utm_source=petition_update&utm_medium=email

https://www.facebook.com/anonymousforjustice/


KOH TAO VERDICT BRINGS OUT VICTIMS OF THAI JUSTICE

$
0
0
SOME OLD WOUNDS, SOME NEW ONES, COME TO THE FORE AS CONTROVERSIAL  MURDER TRIAL ROW CONTINUES

As the row over the conviction and death sentences of two young Burmese for the murders of Britons Hannah Witheridge and David Miller on the Thai cisland of Koh Tao continued to boil – it has become apparent that the controversial case has become a rallying point for other victims and relatives of victims of Thai justice.

Wai Phyo and Zaw Lin with Burmese Embassy officials pre-trial





While the Burmese government has asked Thailand to review the case and the Ambassador has complainied about being misquoted in a Bangkok Post report, demonstrations continue in Burma and at Thai Embassies abroad hundreds of Brits, including many expats, have gone on social media to express their views on Thai police and the justice system.

Colin Vard at Ministry of Justice

Sue Jones
And they have been joined by Sue Jones, the mother of Kirsty Jones who was murdered and rape in Chiang Mai in 2000, followed by another botched investigation, Pauline Ayling whose husband Paul was murdered in Hua Hin in 2012, followed by seemingly no investigation at all, and Vanida Boongeon whose husband was gunned down in Chaiyaphum in 2013 followed by other failed investigation.


And they are joined by Irish man Colin Vard who had seven properties ripped off him in Phuket he says by crooked police, bank staff, money lenders and lawyer; Briton Ian Rance who was ripped off in a similar way and Annie Hansen mother of Jack Hansen-Bartel who is facing corrupt officials in Samui having been attacked in a club by the son of a Chinese American millionaire.

Colin Vard’s daughter has the ‘Justice for Jessie’ Facebook and a Justice for Jack’ page has been set up for Jack Hansen Bartel.  The Rance family has several videos up on YouTube.

Anita Hayling with her husband in Hua Hin hospital. He was ambushed on his motorbike with a wooden club and died
;later in the UK


A ‘Thailand Justice’ Facebook page is one of many which carries widespread criticism.  The Thai authorities have now backed away from suggesting that it is some sort of political conspiracy against them a theory which was promoted by Deputy Prime Minister Prawit Wongsuwon who wanted a manhunt for the culprits.

Annie Hansen

While Thai citizens know to be wary of their own police force, it appears the government is unaware that foreigners are also wary and have been major victims, and is surprised at the reaction both of westerners and Burmese.
American Thai Vanida Boongeon

Pol Maj Gen Piyaphan Pingmuang announced that there were prosecutions in 126 murder cases involving Myanmar people in Thailand over the past year and wondered why there was no fuss over those cases.

This presumably was to suggest that the Burmese were a murderous lot and this sort of thing was not unusual.  However it seems to have had the effect of causing people to wonder what the Thai authorities had done to those 126 Burmese and when will Thailand publish its next murder statistics.

It is now known that the trial judges completely dismissed the evidence of Thailand’s Chief Forensic scientist Dr. Pornthip Rojanasund and contemptuously dismissed the evidence of Andy Hall of the Myanmar Workers Rights Network who testified to the discrepancies in the Thai Post Mortem compared with one carried out on Hannah Witheridge in Norwich; and the identification of the ‘running man’ in the CCTV video on Koh Tao.

And if the following assessment is to be believed it appears that the court did not really understand DNA nor did the prosecution witnesses.  This comes from a person who had been at the trial with considerable medical and legal experience.

1. It consists of a one page table replete with hand written amendments, date changes and data alterations. This document would NOT be admissible in any court in the UK, Australia, USA, EU, Hong Kong, Malaysia or Singapore. 
2. It is NOT supported by any case notes, chain-of-custody records, nor statistics based on validated population data bases. The omission of that information is a COMPLETE abrogation of international ISO 17025 standards and would lead to a FULL audit of the police laboratory by an international accreditation agency!
3. The table has been used to match DNA components, which is an extreme oversimplification of the entire DNA process! It relies on single alleles rather than genotypes. (An allele is ONE of a pair of genes that appear in ONE part of a chromosome that help to determine heredity traits.)
4. Because there is NO statistical analysis to determine the probability of the stated frequencies in the table, it is absolutely NOT possible to determine the likelihood of the accused as being the contributors to the mixture! There, in fact, could be a VERY large number of other individuals who could NOT be ruled out as contributors! 
5. It is, therefore, COMPLETELY erroneous (wrong) to claim a DNA match on the basis of the position of mere alleles on a DNA molecule without statistics to determine the probability!

For these reasons, it CANNOT be said (from any kind of scientific or legal standpoint) that there was a match between the DNA from the semen the police alleged to have and the DNA that was (forcibly, without consent or legal representation) retrieved from the two accused! Basing the conviction on COMPLETELY flawed DNA evidence has resulted in an EXTREME miscarriage of justice!

“WE WILL CATCH THE CYBER MEN" say Thai Police under attack for Koh Tao murder investigation

$
0
0


"It's no problem. Thai Police are excellent'

“No they could not find a murderer in the same room” – says wife of victim in unsolved murder.

"We have killed J(T)awad" announcement on SMS - two hours after murder but before police were called".

ONLY IN THAILAND


The technical know-how of the Royal Thai Police subject to ridicule yesterday as an ‘Anonymous’ hacker collective known as 'Blink' believed to be Burmese, took down fourteen police websites including  the Bangkok Metropolitan Police Bureau and General Staff Division.

Police spokesman Dechnarong Suticharnbancha said he had ordered the Technology Crime Suppression Division to track down the perpetrators.

Said Dechnarong:

“Even if the source of attack was from abroad, they will be convicted eventually. “It’s not a problem. Thai police are excellent.” 
In a matter of seconds he had added another unlikely claim to the country’s police library of ill-considered police statements the most common of which is: ‘We will make an arrest within a week’.

The attacks followed publication on Sunday of a report on Facebook by ‘Anonymous’ (not confirmed as the same group) naming mafia figures on the island of Koh Tao as being those responsible for the murders of Hannah Witheridge and David Miller last year.



The attack was a vicious portrayal of corruption and incompetence in the RTP and ‘Anonymous’ called on tourists to boycott Thailand for their own safety.; this despite the fact that the family of David Miller have expressed satisfaction at the verdict.

While the controversy over the conviction and death sentences of two Burmese for the murders of Hanna Witheridge and David Miller continues amid allegations of dubious DNA evidence, up country in the North Eastern Thai province of Chaiyaphum – police have had a surfeit of DNA evidence on a murder which they appear reluctant to solve.

And the victim’s widow said:

 “If the Royal Thai Police were in the same room that the murder happened they would still be capable of losing the DNA, forensic evidence, and forgetting what actually what went on in front of their eyes.”


Jawad
In the murder case of Jawad Rasheed Khan, who was gunned down by two assailants using .22 and 9mm handguns police have suppressed DNA evidence and sent a case to the public prosecutor so shoddy that they had no hope of gaining a conviction.

Currently there appears to be a dispute between Chaiyaphum’s former police chief and the current one. This appears to have enable police files to be released.   The initial prosecution file was so poorly put together that not only did it have the day of the murder wrong, but also the year.


The day and the morning of the murder, November 20 2013, Jawad’s wife Vanida Boongeon, an American-Thai, who had returned home to open a fish farm in her own village, received threats from Uwe Seliger, a German national.  (Seliger had paid a dowry to a young Thai wife whom Vanida had found for him.  But on the wedding night she failed to deliver and Seliger blamed Vanida accusing her of fraud.





His messages sent by SMS on the AIS system were direct death threats less than two hours after the deed but police did not treat them seriously.

The messages were written to suggest Vanida Boongeon had commissioned the deed. But he announced the deed before police were informed of the murder but at 5.42 nearly two hpurs after it. And AIS confirm these messages.





Jawad was gunned down on his fish farm, which was a large supplier of Tilapia fish to the CP conglomerate, the day after he had a major row with Vanida’s brother Thongpuen Boongeon after catching him stealing fish and loading them up to sell privately.

Thongpeun and Seliger were seen together the same day.




Vanida
At the farm at the time of the murder on the fish farm about 4 am were Vanida’s brother, her sister and her sister’s husband. The murder was not reported until after 7 am and the police did not arrive until after 9 am.
By then there was evidence that Jawad’s body was moved from outside to inside the room where he usually slept. His blood was found outside and in the mosquito net where the sister and husband slept, and blood DNA was taken from Thong.. leg and shirt and he had both Jawad and his own blood on him. 
After the murder he had scratches and bruises which suggested he was involved in a scuffle.

DNA from a third person was also discovered. Police appear to have done little to find out to whom that belonged.

Seven months after the murder on June 5 2014 the prosecutor ordered the formal dismissal of murder case 1395/2556 and ordered no future investigation.
The order was signed by Mr. Chumporn Thongpaeng, Specialist Prosecutor, Region 3, Royal Thai Police Chaiyaphum and Prosecutor, Mr. Satiratch Paitonphitak, Prosecutor Department, Chaiyaphum.


The reason for the formal acquittal of both accused (who had only spent one night in custody) was that the defendants said they did not do it and police did not believe Thongpeun did not do anything wrong.


“According testimonies of Mr. Thongpuen Boongeon, Ms. Wanna and Mr. Kompong Peuleung  (sister and husband)  Jawad Rasheed Khan drove from Nonthaburi on 17 November 2013, and arrived at Ban Non Liam between 10 – 11:pm same day.
 

Mr. Boongeon heard a gun shots from window around 4:am on 20 November 2013, the gun fired 4 – 5 round ammunition inter Jawad’s body.
 
Mr. Thongpeun knew this because he is slept in same bed with Mr. Jawad Rasheed Khan.  Jawad slept on right side of the bed and Mr.Thongpeun slept on left side of the bed.  And the gun was fired from window above Thongpeun’s head. 
 Prosecutor do not believed that Mr. Thongpeun did anything wrong, because Mr. Thongpeun had stated and both prosecutors believed him. 
Autopsy report revealed that 3 bullets fired that enter Jawad body from .22 pistols.  According to the doctor handling the autopsy Jawad was alive three to four hours after was shot.Before going to bed, all 4 people watch tv together and drink beer as well.


And on Uwe Seliger they reported:



Uwe Seliger - unrequited love


"There is no proof that he ordered the killing since there is no one come forward to claimed that he he had hired someone to kill Jawad Rasheed Khan.

b.    Only proves that they has is SMS threaten which sent on/before of Jawad being shots.

c.    SMS doesn’t prove anything, it is just matter of threaten

d.    Suspect had denial all the charged and both prosecutors believe him also."


Vanida Boongeon said: “I know my family did it. And I believe they did it for only 50,000 Thai baht which they were paid. There was no sign of alcohol in Jawad’s body and police did nothing to verify the trajectory of the bullets, which it seems could not have been fired from the window.”  


She points to the DNA testimony which shows the Jawad’s blood was found on Thongpeun’s leg and shirt and also Thongpeun’s blood was found on his own leg and shirt supporting the fight theory.   In her sister’s room was a blood soaked blanket, there was more blood outside Jawad’s room, where police said he was murdered, than inside it.


Shot 3 times in bed but little blood here where he was discovered- and none on the bed!


But most strange of all is that Thongpeun, Wanna and Kampong Peulueang casually walked out of the farm between 8.30- and 9 am to report the incident to a farm worker. ..and police were not notified until after 7 am and there is no record of the name of the caller.

The decision to dismiss cases against Seliger and Thongpeun close the investigation and not look for the third man suggest not only is a foreigner’s life cheap in Chaiyaphum but the life of a Pakistani national just like that of a Burmese, hardly merits a second glance.  

It also gives another slant to the oft quoted expression: ‘There is nothing under the sun the Thai Police cannot do.’
Inquiries continue.

Fishy smell from Chaiyaphum

Murder she said

MORAL:  Confess before police are actually informed of the murder and they don't get to beat it out of you. That way Thai police can beat the innocence out?and insist you must be mistaken.

TWENTY FIVE YEARS OF MURDER IN THAILAND PART I

$
0
0
THAILAND'S MURDER HISTORY FROM A BRITISH FOREIGN CORRESPONDENT'S VIEW 

INTRODUCTION: Following the controversial death sentences on the young Burmese men Wai Phyo and Zaw Lin in Koh Samui for the murders last year on Koh Tao of Hannah Witheridge and Davild Miller, I have been asked to detail the controversial cases where flagrant breaches of Thai justice  occurred or were attempted by those in charge of it. 

As a British journalist my involvement has mainly been involved with British or at least English speaking victims or accused. But there were also major other-country cases which drew the attention of the international media in which I was involved.

I should preface this by saying cases are sometimes, not always, resolved when the international media gets involved. This tends to encourage the Thai authorities to work quickly to put an end to the bad publicity.

In these murders there has been a recurring theme of ‘round up the usual foreign suspects’ and many an innocent foreigner has ended up on the front pages of newspapers back home as the prime suspect in a murder in Thailand.

Foreign governments nowadays do not like the involvement of the media.  The British Embassy policy has always been in Thailand to tell victims not to talk to the media. They know best.

This of course is often not true but British Ambassadors and Deputy Heads of Mission have been known to take a pro-active role or stick their heads above the parapet in the cases with the right demographic.

This demographic does tend to preclude the average Pattaya Brit for example.

Fortunately most families have been kind enough to talk to me and in the main we remain in contact till this day.  Not all of the cases I have reported on fit into the 'flagrant' category - but if you read you will see why the foreign media roll their eyes at Thai police activity and why the local media dare not take the police on.

Although the title says 25 years of murder in Thailand - in this short series I am not writing about them all.

First some tourist victims from days gone by


MURDERED BY A MONK –  CAUGHT AFTER TIP-OFF FROM 'RAPED TOURIST'


Johanne Masheder 


Johanne Masheder, 23, from Wincle,  Cheshire,  was murdered in Kanchanaburi in December 1995.  

When she had not returned on the scheduled date her parents raised the alarm. Johanne was touring Thailand alone.

 At the request of the British Embassy Thai police started a search. It took them to Koh Samui where she had been. But Thai police did not have a clue and stories soon began appearing g in the Thai press suggesting she was not dead at all but the family were pulling an insurance scam.

However an Austrian tourist, named Inge, wrote to the Bangkok Post to say that she had been sexually attacked and raped by a monk in Wat Tham Kao Poon in Kanchanaburi. The monk had used excessive violence.

She had not reported the crime to police, and few foreign women did report rape to police in Thailand at that time and those that did regretted it.  The situation has not improved noticeably.

Johanne’s decomposed body was found in a cave in the temple grounds. The novice monk had previously been jailed for rape and was a drug addict. He said he was disappointed that she had only about 500 baht - £10 -  in her purse.

 It appears a lot of criminals turn to the monk-hood in Thailand, though whether it is to make merit against their sins, or seek 'sanctuary' is not quite clear/


It is very probable Johanne's body would never have been found had not Inge written in with her information.

This was the first high profile murder case I covered in Thailand. Would this scare tourists away asked Thai police? It never did.  The nature of the crime gave an inkling of what was to come. At the time most people considered it an aberration in a peaceful south East Asian backwater.

It was not. This case was the first of many which to all intents and purposes gradually changed my role in Thailand from Foreign Correspondent to Crime Correspondent.

Immigration Police nicknamed 'Dream Team' looking for Johanne on  Koh Samui. They did not know where to look
but then neither did anyone else except those at the temple.

Not long after I began writing about muggings or rather hand bag snatches in Koh Samui which drew ire from hotel operators and even the publisher of TTR Weekly in Bangkok who denied such an incident happened. But the victims were real enough. And today the snatches are common enough in Thailand and have even resulted in the deaths of tourists.



RAPE, MURDER AND POLICE TORTURE IN CHIANG MAI

Kirsty Jones

Probably the most controversial unsolved British case was that of Kirsty Jones, 23, who was raped and murdered in the Aree Guest House in Chiang Mai in 2000.  In this case police and media trampled over the murder scene,disgusting  post crime pictures of Kirsty were published in the Thai media, and police were left clueless, or rather they did not see the clues. 

 A string of foreigners were brought in as ‘suspects’ with police giving various reasons as to why they did it.

Nathan went hysterical when he was told he was a suspect.
Newspaper readers in Australia would have been shocked.
This picture was taken in the crime scene which had not
yet been examined for forensics.
These included Australian Nathan Foley a fellow back-packer who actually had a meal with Kirsty the night before, Stuart Crichton, an Aussie with a drugs problem, who had gone to Chiang Mai to chill out and an American mormon who also claimed to be an FBI agent, who had a fight with a reporter from the Guardian.

Were it not for the horror of the attack on Kirsty, visiting the Aree Guest House would have been like walking into a sit-co TV set.

Such was the nature of the guest house that none of the backpackers or staff who heard the screams in the middle of the night went to investigate.

 A Briton Stephen Trigg admitting hearing Kirsty shouting: ‘Leave me alone. Leave me alone. Get off me!’ but decided it was merely a domestic argument and did not interfere.

As the investigation progressed a  Chiang Mai police officer also came out with the statement that police considered that Kirsty was a willing participant in sex but things had turned violent when her partner attacked her anally,

Foreign correspondents were also stunned as police went on to say it must be a 'farang' (foreigner) as Thais do not indulge in anal sex.

The crime scene had been trampled over by police, media, and even the occasional sightseer before forensic examination was carried out.

When it became clear that evidence implicating those suspects was non existent, plain clothed police abducted a Karen tour guide called Narong  (who had been in charge of Kirsty’s hill trek) took him to a ‘safe house’ and began to torture him with electric shock treatment to his genitals.

They also ordered him to masturbate. However not surprisingly he was unable to ejaculate.  He was later dumped by the side of the road outside Chiang Mai.



Narong

















I interviewed Narong and subsequently published a story in the ‘Sunday Times. The story was then copied in the Thai Press, and the Chiang Mai Guide Association demonstrated on the streets and at the Regional Police Headquarters. The story had originally come from a Thai reporter who told me because he dare not break the news himself.

There was a very clear message that the locals did not trust their own police.



Thai interpreters,  employed by myself and the BBC were described by police as ‘traitors’ to Thailand.

Police finally settled on charging the British owner of the guest house Andy Gill and his manager Surin. It’s alleged that Gill was spotted through a window committing the act.  Surin was a former monk who had earned a reputation for hitting on female foreign tourists.

Gill, a heavy drinker, had an alibi. He was out late drinking as usual and had witnesses to prove it.

Police were finally forced to release Gill and Surin as the DNA of the killer did not match. Besides the DNA was Asian which had put a real spanner in the works and this was confirmed by the British Home Office.

At this stage two officers from the Dyfed-Powys Police in Wales had become involved (DCS Steve Wilkins and DI Steve Hughson). Wilkins pledged to close the case before he retired. He didn't.

ANDY GILL  on his release from prison
(Although this was a horrific crime there was a light moment after his release after Mayured Kasemjit replied after I asked her about the 600,000 Thai baht Gill's father had sent from Andorra to pay police (about US$20,000) to 'clear Andy's problems)...'Police took it all.'

I had mentioned that in an article after which Mayured was brought to the police station and made to state she had not paid police any cash at all. Bundles of 1000 baht notes were piled in front of her for the cameras.
\

Mayured with the alleged 'cash'.


I can't say what happened to that cash. A  bad choice in Thai girlfriend or police - both can be equally as demanding. But I would have loved to have been at the press conference. For what is for sure is that Andy Gill's dad never got it back.)

On the night of the murder neighbours reported the presence of a well-known Chiang Mai tourist policeman and a second person loitering outside the guest house. The policeman was DNA tested on request but did not match the killer’s DNA. His companion, allegedly a University professor, also tested negative.

Despite repeated visits to Thailand by Dyfed Police (Wales) and the offer of a reward, the killer was never found. The investigation was taken out of the hands of the Chiang Mai Police and handed over to the Department of Special Investigations. The case was  still never solved.

Dyfed Powys Police Wilkinms and Hughson arrive in Chiang Mai

Kirsty’s mother Sue Jones and I believe that many people in Chiang Mai knew who it was.  Sue Jones formed the view that the British Foreign prioritised diplomacy over justice for her daughter.  Over the years she had repeatedly been advised not to upset the Thai authorities.




MURDERED BY POLICE BY THE RIVER KWAI – SIXTEEN WITNESSES ALL TOO FRIGHTENED TO TESTIFY.

Vanessa Arscott and Adam Lloyd


Vanessa Arscott, 24 and Adam Lloyd, 25, both from Devon,  were murdered by the banks of the River Kwai in Kanchanaburi by Thai Police Senior Sergeant Somchai Wisetsingh in September 2004. Wisetsingh was the ‘ Policeman of the Year’ in Region 8.

Having fun and Wisetsinghs S & S restaurant - Adam and
Vanessa
He first shot Adam then as Vanessa ran away he ran her down in his Volvo and dragged her under his car for 20 yards. As she crawled out to try and raise herself on an electric pylon he gunned her down. shooting execution style to her forehead, face and neck.

Adam and Vanessa had been eating and drinking in Wisetsingh’s S & S restaurant on the River Kwai Road in Kanchanaburi.

Somchai fled over the Burmese border and after a month or so was handed over to the Thai authorities by Karen rebels. Then the investigation began.  But there were no witnesses – at least to the murder.



Happy and cheerful



Nobody in Kanchanaburi it seems wanted to name Wisetsingh. With help from contacts in the area enabled  the family and I managed to actually find some 16 witnesses who did talk to Vanessa’s parents Graham and Joyce Arscott and her sister Alyssa and name Wisetsingh as the murderer.

Even the police admitted that six witnesses to the murder had been interviewed while Wisetsingh was on the run, but they too refused to testify. Police told the foreign media they would not give him bail as it was feared he would interfere with witnesses.

When he was arrested Wisetsingh was duly given bail.



Then she meets the Thai cop

And the cop gunned down her boyfriend, ran her over in his car, and literally
executed her ' Bang, Bang Bang' with three bullets to her head, face and neck.
Forgetting their ‘We do not interfere with the justice system of another country’ policy the British Embassy also took the family to the Office of the Attorney General, Ministry of Justice and Commissioner of Police.

The Arscotts and Lloyds at the Ministry of Justice


The Thai authorities were of course as usual in these cases extremely hospitable.

The Arscotts and Lloyds at lunch with local police chief and Embassy officials (interpreter right)


But the work on the ground in Kanchanaburi enabled the family to be sure that Somchai was the killer.

It was also easy to conclude that Somchai should not have been a policeman all. He had been married four times.

One of his wives did testify. Named Dting she said:

 "I was one of the luckier wives - he did not shoot at me. But he took out his guns and shot his first and second wives. There was never any police investigation. He was a complete womaniser. He likes to go for tourists or married women.”

His colleagues in Kanchanaburi also resented his arrest. At his trial they pepper sprayed photographers as they jostled to get a picture.

Somchai pleaded not guilty saying the killer was a drugs contact of his whom he did not name. He was sentenced to death on each murder.

But then incredibly despite his pack of lies the judge commuted the sentences to life imprisonment 50 years and then down to down to 33 years and four months respectively, in the light of Wisetsingh's ‘surrender to the police, an initial confession he made before the trial and his good service as a policeman.’

Since he was  jailed in 2005 there have been frequent reports that he has been let free but the family keeps in contact with lawyers in Bangkok who check with the Department of Corrections.

But his sentences were cut again while in prison, In 2013 the Department of Corrections said his release date had been brought forward to 2022, meaning he is now serving an 18 year sentence or perhaps less.

At the conclusion of the trial Graham Arscott said the initial police investigation

"showed a level of incompetence which was truly beyond belief".



Footnote:


Master Sergeant Daenchai Khunkongmee, aged 35, the successor to Wisetsingh was accused of shooting a woman with his pistol in her vagina after making love to her in a short time hotel in Kanchanaburi,.

“It was an accident. I did not mean it,” he told investigators. Meanwhile the woman 37-yr-old Nittaya Jaisue, aged 37, was taken critically ill in a local hospital. 

Amazingly she is reported to have recovered. She initially said Daenchai tried to kill her.  but later withdrew her statement..



Vanessa with hill tribe kids in Northern Thailand - dream holiday

And finally in this first installment I should mention the rape of Australian Sheri Macfarlane and murder of her boyfriend Kelvin Bourke near Fang, Chiang Mai province in the same year as the Kirsty Jones case.

They were attacked while camping out in Doi Ang Khan National Park. Two Chinese Haw, descendants of the Kuomintang Chinese National army were arrested for the murder of Bourke and rape of Macfarlane.

Similar to the Koh Tao case both claimed they were tortured to confess. The young men Chinyong Sae Yang, 19, and Inthorn Sae Jong, 20. were sentenced to death.

The decision was overturned on appeal at which the defence were aided by Dr.Porntip Rojanasunan. Thailand's Chief Forensic officer. Thai police had lied to say there was a DNA match.  The defence team was now able to prove there was not.

Dr. Porntip said there was no hope of finding the real killers as poor crime scene investigative work by Thai police at the time probably meant valuable clues went uncovered and were now lost.

COMMENT:

Thai police have repeatedly been held up to get their forensic scenes of crime work in order and to not disturb the scenes of the crime. Ten years after the Kirsty Jones murder I visited the Thai Police forensic lab. Just as a member of FRANC* had told me, it was pristine, super-modern,....and unused.  

Thai Police have repeatedly been told that their DNA analysis should be carried out by independent forensic scientists. In the hands of a bent policeman it is too tempting to fix the results.  

It is also clear that members of the Thai judiciary often know little of law and even less about DNA and becoming a judge, like a policeman, is sought after for its lucrative benefits - which are not the 30,000  baht (US$1000) a month salary and expenses.

*FRANC - Foreign Anti Narcotics Committee. 30 years ago most officers sent to Thailand were mainly dealing with drugs crimes. They had regular meetings and regular booze-ups. I attended a few often in the 'wrong' areas of Bangkok.  Much more politically correct nowadays.next:



NEXT: POLICE THREATEN WITNESSES TO BACK PACKER MURDER.

MURDER ON SAMUI

THAILAND - A DANGEROUS PLACE FOR A GOOD ACCOUNTANT




ANTI-CORRUPTION WHITEWASH IN THAILAND IS ADDING 'INSULT TO INJURY' - Human Rights Watch

$
0
0
Human Rights Wast has condemned Thailand's Anti-Corruption Commission for dismissing a malfeasance case against former government officials for their role in the orders to shoot at demonstrators during the 2010 crackdown on the 'Red Shirts'.

And HRW has accused the current government of 'airbrushing' Thai history. As pretty much all of Thai history is airbrushed at elementary school level in Thailandand the best place to study it is abroad  the latter is not a new accusation. 

But the accusations against the Anti-Corruption Commission are of concern because powers have already been removed from the Department of Special Investigations, which is being used against for political purposes, and also the Thai National Human Rights Commission. 

The cases were brought against former PM Abhisit Vejajjiva, his deputy Suthep Thaugsuban, and former army chief General Anupong Paojinda. It is however not unusual for the Thai Army to be acquitted of atrocities, or indeed even brought to account.

The current military government of General Prayuth Chan-Ocha has claimed it has stepped in to clear corruption in Thailand - and it has indeed moved against corrupt elements in the National Police force.


But its most dramatic move to clear out the Central Investigation Bureau and Crime Suppression Division which was running rackets including  selling police appointments and illegal trading in oil and wildlife, and gambling was taken because the order came from 'the palace' and many of those in high positions in those organisations were relatives and friends of the Crown Prince's last wife.

It is highly unlikely action would have been taken otherwise.

Andrew-Drummond.com has been blocked in Thailand for nine months, but although this site has reported on continued army corruption, that may not be the reason. It may be connected to a convicted criminal who two years ago tried but failed to get the government to withdraw my press accreditation.

Both the Ministries of Foreign Affairs and Communications have failed to reply to questions from the Foreign Correspondents Club of Thailand, which itself has had to cancel a number of events due to government threats.



Here  follows the HRW report:


Thailand: New Whitewash of 2010 Political Violence
No Accountability for Officials, Soldiers in Crackdown

(New York, January 7, 2016) – Thailand’s anti-corruption commission’s dismissal of malfeasance charges against former senior officials for their role in the violent 2010 crackdown on “Red Shirt” protesters is a serious setback for accountability in the country, Human Rights Watch said today.

On December 29, 2015, the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) voted to drop the case against former prime minister Abhisit Vejjajiva, his deputy Suthep Thaugsuban, and former army chief Gen. Anupong Paojinda regarding their failure to review the use of military force that resulted in the loss of lives and the destruction of property, and dereliction of duty.

“Despite killings by soldiers of protesters, medics, and even reporters in broad daylight in downtown Bangkok for all the world to see, Thailand’s institutions have closed ranks to protect the army and politicians from justice,” said Brad Adams, Asia director at Human Rights Watch. “This adds insult to injury to victims and their families as they watch yet another stage in nearly six-years of attempts to airbrush the crimes of officials and soldiers from Thai history.”

The military crackdown on the United Front for Democracy against Dictatorship (UDD), known as the “Red Shirts,” took place between April 7 and May 19, 2010, and resulted in at least 98 deaths and more than 2,000 injuries.

The NACC, citing the Bangkok Civil Court’s ruling on April 22, 2010 that the Red Shirt protests were not peaceful and some protesters were armed, ruled that it was necessary for the three officials to order soldiers to carry weapons and use force to reclaim protest sites. The NACC found that it was sufficient that soldiers were ordered to proceed from light to heavy measures in accordance with standard procedures and not to target unarmed protesters.

The Justice Ministry’s Department of Special Investigation (DSI) had charged Abhisit and Suthep with murder and attempted murder under the doctrine of command responsibility for ordering the military crackdown on Red Shirt protesters in 2010. The DSI filed the charges after inquests found that protesters were killed and wounded by gunshots fired by soldiers acting on the orders of the Center of the Resolution of the Emergency Situation (CRES), which Abhisit set up under Suthep’s command.

On August 28, 2014, the Bangkok Criminal Court ruled that it had no jurisdiction to try Abhisit and Suthep because they were political officeholders at the time. Instead, the court referred the case to the NACC – which is responsible for inquiries regarding abuse of official positions – to determine whether there was sufficient evidence to proceed with a case of malfeasance in the Supreme Court’s Criminal Division for Holders of Political Positions.

Contrary to the NACC’s conclusion that the use of force by the CRES was justified and followed standard procedures, Human Rights Watch found that soldiers used live ammunition starting on the afternoon of April 10, 2010 – killing and wounding protesters, journalists, and bystanders – many hours before the armed “Black Shirt” militants, who operated in tandem with protesters, showed up and fought with soldiers.

Human Rights Watch’s May 2011 report, “Descent into Chaos: Thailand’s 2010 Red Shirt Protests and the Government Crackdown,” documented that excessive and unnecessary force by the military caused many deaths and injuries during the 2010 political confrontations. The high number of casualties – including unarmed protesters, volunteer medics, reporters, photographers, and bystanders – resulted in part from the enforcement of “live fire zones” around the UDD protest sites in Bangkok, where sharpshooters and snipers were deployed by the CRES. Human Rights Watch also documented that some elements of the UDD, including armed Black Shirt militants, committed deadly attacks on soldiers, police, and civilians. Some UDD leaders incited violence with inflammatory speeches to demonstrators, urging their supporters to carry out riots, arson attacks, and looting.

Similar findings were presented in September 2012 by the independent Truth for Reconciliation Commission of Thailand (TRCT), which recommended the authorities “address legal violations by all parties through the justice system, which must be fair and impartial.”

The prospects for justice for victims of the 2010 violence have long been bleak, Human Rights Watch said. The Department of Special Investigation issued a finding in September 2012 that indicated the military was culpable for 36 deaths. However, insufficient efforts have been made to identify the soldiers and commanding officers responsible for the shootings. Under pressure from the military, successive Thai governments charged UDD leaders and supporters with serious criminal offenses but ignored abuses by soldiers.

The Thai government should direct the Department of Special Investigation to identify and bring to justice those responsible for the deaths and injuries during the May 2010 violence without further delay, Human Rights Watch said.

“It’s outrageous that not a single official, military commander, or soldier has been held to account for the bloody 2010 crackdown,” Adams said. “Opportunities for the Thai government to demonstrate that unbiased justice underlies the rule of law and political reconciliation are fading fast.”

LINK TO REPORT

ANOTHER BRIT DEATH ON THAI ISLAND OF KOH TAO

$
0
0
From mushroom shakes to strawberry daquiris another Brit 'living the life' ends it in controversial Thai tourist destination.


Another Briton has been found dead on the Thai holiday island of Koh Tao and has been named as Luke Miller of Newport, Isle of Wight. 

Miller is reported to have died yesterday after jumping into the pool attached to the Sunset bar and restaurant resort.

Police say they suspect no foul play.


Police Lt Col Napha Senathip, an investigative officer at Koh Tao Police Station, is quoted by the Khao Sod newspaper as saying: 

“He must have climbed to the roof of a [nearby] DJ booth, jumped off, and his head hit the swimming pool floor, killing him.”

Police added that he may have been intoxicated at the time. There were cuts on  his hands from they believe barbed wire as he climbed onto a DJs booth.

Miller had last posted on Facebook on December 31st New Year’s Eve after being chastised for his wild behaviour.

Luke was travelling with two friends who called themselves the ‘Three Musketeers’ for a five week holiday in Thailand and was clearly excited by the prospect.

He had even posted his travel booking.

In his last post he wrote as if he was travelling to the Full Moon party on Koh Phangan:


 “Can honestly say this new year I am living the dream of to the full moon party on a speed boat drink cocktails strawberry daiquiris living life to the full yolo so let's do this”.




But the day before along with three pictures he posted:

“What a 2 day bender on mushroom shakes shit has gone down lol loving life”


The Samui archipelgao is well known for its hallucinogenic 'magic mushrooms' which were also famously were featured in the film  'Bridget Jones - The Edge of Reason'.


This was quickly followed by a post from Sara Cotton saying:


 “That's not being safe Luke Miller and James Gissing."xxx don't start me worrying again!!! Xxxx”.




His pal James Gissing had also been warned on Facebook:


 “Smacking in the sun.. Like drinking in the sun only fucks u up more.”

A crowd funding site to repatriate Miller’s body had today raised over £4,000 of its £5000 target.




Koh Tao is of course where Hannah Witheridge from Norfolk and David Miller from Jersey were murdered last year and where questions still surround the death of Nick Pearson, 25, from Derby, who is reported to have drowned after falling into rocks last year.  His parents believe the circumstances of his death were covered up.




On New Year’s Eve 2013/4 Stephen Ashton was shot dead on Koh Phangan when he was caught up in a fight between rival Thai groups.


Miller’s Facebook posts suggest there is no change to the free drugs culture on the island which is controlled by local Mafia who control local police.

Koh Tao is in the same district as Koh Phangan and is police from the larger island.

The FCO has stated that is it giving consular assistance to the family.

The Foreign and Commonwealth Office gives the following warning for travellers to the Koh Samui Archipelago, but few seem to take the advice or even read it.

"Western tourists including British nationals have been victims of vicious, unprovoked attacks by individuals and gangs in Koh Samui, Koh Phangan and Koh Tao (the Samui archipelago). In January 2013 a British national was killed in a shooting incident while at a beach party in Haad Rin on Koh Phanang and in September 2014, 2 British nationals were killed in Tao.
Violent sexual assaults and robberies against both men and women are reported regularly in the Koh Samui archipelago and Krabi province. These are particularly common during the monthly Full Moon parties and generally occur late at night near bars.
Tourists have also been robbed after bringing visitors to their hotel rooms. In some cases their drinks were drugged. Be careful about taking drinks from strangers and at clubs and parties, particularly in Koh Samui, Pattaya and at the Full Moon party on Koh Phangan, where date rapes have been reported.
Attacks have also occurred in other tourist districts in Thailand including Chiang Mai, Pattaya and Krabi. In light of the risk of unprovoked attacks you should be cautious and take care, especially at night.
Alcohol and drugs can lead to you being less alert, less in control and less aware of your environment resulting in accidents, injuries, robbery, assaults and lost travel documents. If you drink, know your limit. Drinks served in bars overseas are often stronger than those in the UK. Some British nationals in Thailand have suffered severe psychiatric problems because of drug use, resulting in some suicides."

A GLIMMER OF HOPE F0R VICTIMS PROPERTY FRAUD IN THAILAND

$
0
0
BUT DON'T CRACK OPEN THE CHAMPAGNE - WANNA BUY A HOTEL IN PATTAYA?

A hotel in Pattaya which is already mortgaged to a bank has now joined the list of properties offered and sold to foreigners.

The Ahmedabad Mirror in India is reporting that Indian travel agent Bhargav Verma, has lodged a case of fraud against Saleem Veetil owner of Pattaya based Thai Vision Holidays after putting down the equivalent of US$420,000 deposit on a hotel called the ‘Erawan’

“It was only after paying the huge amount did he realise the property on sale had been mortgaged by a (Thai) bank,” the newspaper reported.


“On Friday, the Navrangpura police submitted a complaint by Varma (45), owner of
Arushi Air Travel, against Salim Veetil,” the newspaper added.

But quite how far that complaint will go in Gujarat is mind boggling, because complaints of this nature in Pattaya tend to go nowhere as the authorities will not even investigate.


Emerald Palace
Good news however for some investors in the Emerald Palace Condominium in Pattaya who were sold by Harlequin (Thailand) – a subsidiary of David Ames’ Harlequin Property in the UK  (David Ames) and Thai Media and Property Exhibition Company (Richard Haughton)  while it was mortgaged to the Kasikorn Bank, the Vice Chairman of which incidentally got a pad there for his mistress, (see video).

The scam was first exposed on this site. Haughton was President of the Pattaya-Jomtien Rotary Club.

When the buyers who included 20 Brits, Russians, Germans, French etc., turned up to claim their properties,  many found they did not have them and the rest were told that they would have to contribute togethjer to pay off the 70 million baht bank loan if they wanted the deeds.

The company which owned the property was in fact Headland Holdings which was swiftly moved into the hands of Limcharoen, a company on the British Embassy law list for Brits in distress (used to have British partners but they went their own way).

It was this company which forced the buyers to cough up more on the basis that if they did not they would lose everything.

Some paid up. Others did not. Several  went on to win their cases and Headland was ordered to hand over the chanotes (title deeds) or give the cash back to the foreigners.  Now I am told that that judgment is being enforced and all property in the name of Headland Holdings will now have to go to auction to pay off the buyers.


Police and angry buyers at the Emerald Palace.  But who were police representing


Who are the winners? Hard to see;. Property in Pattaya has slumped but I guess there will always be a market.


Richard Haughton - TPME
Pattaya City Council’s Consumer Affairs Department had been asked to step in. But as it’s Pattaya, a mafia city if ever there was one,  it seems they do not do many investigations without ripping off the consumers.

I was however present at a meeting with one official at a Pattaya Driving Range in which he did say that at a moment’s notice they could remove someone and have his body taken out to sea by power boat and dropped 100 miles away,

However what was requested was an investigation. Investigations are not their forte it seems and considerably bothersome, what with the time they take to go through the grim Thai court process - something with which I could hardly disagree.


David Ames - Harlequin
Meanwhile in the UK lawyers representing investors in Harlequin there are telling their clients that this is crunch year for David Ames who took some £600 million off Britons, predominantly their pension cash for properties in the Caribbean only a few of which were ever built.  Ames is still the subject of an enquiry by the Serious Fraud Office.

Video: 





WITHERIDGE FAMILY BREAKS SILENCE ON KOH TAO MURDERS WITH ATTACK ON THAILAND

$
0
0
BITTER BUT HEARTFELT STATEMENT FROM HANNAH'S SISTER

SO YOU STILL THINK THAILAND IS BEAUTIFUL?

Laura Witheridge the sister of Hannah Witheridge who was raped then murdered with David Miller on the Thai island of Koh Tao has launched a bitter attack on the internet linking to the ‘Anoymous’ group which has launched cyber attacks against the Thai Police and advocated a boycott of the country.

Clearly angered by the family treatment and attempts by the Thai government to push the murders under the carpet she gives links to the ‘Anonymous’ video her attack was prompted by a poster to a story about Luke Miller, the latest Briton to die on Koh Tao saying ‘Thailand is the most beautiful country in the world.’

“ Lots of things ‘look’ beautiful. You only have to consider a lion, or tiger… beautiful to look at, yes… but get too close and they will tear you apart and feed you to their young. My point being that aesthetic beauty can lure you into a very dangerous trap,” she wrote.

She said that many Thais hated westerners and viewed life as cheap and complains of corruption and had suggested to her that she got over her grief.



But best read the full text below (unaltered) or go direct to the link here.

"So, as some of you may have already seen- there has been another death of yet another British National on koh tao. I wasn’t going to post anything, not until I logged on here this morning to see that a friend had shared the link warning people not to go there… it wasn’t the sharing of the link or the warning that triggered this lengthy status, as I hope people do share these things and try and warn people not to go… it was the ignorant comment someone had made about how Thailand is ‘the most beautiful place in the world’ that frustrated me this morning.  
"Aesthetically, on a postcard or photograph, maybe… However, literally… I have to disagree. Lots of things ‘look’ beautiful. You only have to consider a lion, or tiger… beautiful to look at, yes… but get too close and they will tear you apart and feed you to their young. My point being that aesthetic beauty can lure you into a very dangerous trap.
Since Hannah was taken from us, 
I am continually asked whether I will warn the World about the dangers of Thailand… I am asked if I will warn people because I might just ‘save someone’s life’.  
This person’s comment serves as a perfect example of why I would be wasting my time. People can be ignorant and many, probably the majority, have very short memories. Countless times, 
I have logged in to facebook and seen statuses made by people who know both Hannah and I, who have gone out there anyway. They think it won’t happen to them… Well, guess what? Neither did we. No one is immune. “
 Many thai’s hate westeners and they have little to no regard for human life. I don’t say this lightly, or without reason. Let me share a few facts with you about this ‘beautiful’ place you speak of…
Many of the thai people have no regard for human life. My evidence for this statement: firstly, some quotes of the things said to my bereaved, heart broken family by the judges and court officials at the trial of the two Burmese migrants-

* “why are you here? Why do you care? She is dead already”
* “why are you so bothered? Just go home and make another one”
* “why are you making such a fuss, she will be back in 30 days as
something else, she may have better luck next time” 
Would it surprise you if I told you that the thai’s view drug possession as a more serious offence than rape or murder? Or that the vast majority of the thai police force are corrupt? 
What if I told you that when we went to Thailand to bring Hannah home, we were offered the opportunity to go to the Royal Thai police headquarters for an ‘official update’… but that, on arrival, we were taken into a large room, left for 5 minutes before the door opened and around 200 journalists were allowed into the room and we were ambushed by this mob of hungry journalists shoving cameras in our faces…  
The thai police chief had no intentions of giving us an update… after all, the bungled investigation meant he had nothing to tell us. The invitation was so that he could make money out of our misery. The press had paid him generously for 5 minutes to capture photographs of our family. The photograph on this post serves as evidence of this:

The photo Laura linked to
"What if I told you that since we lost Hannah there have been many more suspicious deaths on koh tao. You probably haven’t heard of them all, as not all were British Nationals. The deaths, where possible, are covered up as suicides and accidents. This would have happened with Hannah, if it had not been for the hideous brutality of her passing.  
Luke Miller latest casualty of Koh Tao
I highly suspect that with this latest tragedy, the thai’s will say that it was an accidental death caused by drugs. Hiding the truth and offering a story that suits, is something that they do often… My thoughts are with Luke Miller's family and friends. 
What if I told you that I have had many death threats from thai people since they murdered my sister? That they defaced photographs of me saying that the killers had only done ‘half the job’… what if I told you that people commented on these photographs saying things like ‘there is still time’, and ‘tick tock tick tock’. What if I told you that I have been sent crime scene photographs? What if I told you that I have been chased in my car? 
What if I told you that the thais offered us ‘compensation’ to try and keep us quiet? Obviously we were absolutely appalled and told them to shove it.
What if I told you that I am now frightened of my own shadow? That I am constantly looking over my shoulder? That I am exhausted, but frightened to sleep because of the nightmares? I miss my sister desperately. My heart is heavy and my mind is tired.

Still think Thailand is beautiful? If your answer is still ‘yes’ then I would suggest you watch the following: 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BRi8AqoXxio&app=desktop"


Below is the Witheridge family statement after Burmese Zaw Lin and Wai Phyo were convicted and sentenced to death.

Burmese sentenced to death
“As the trial concludes and the verdict is delivered, our family, once again, find ourselves in the path of a whirlwind of emotions and difficulties. In these challenging times, we try to concentrate our efforts on remembering our beautiful Hannah for the fun, vibrant and incredible young woman that she was. 
Had her life not been tragically and unnecessarily cut short, she would now have completed her Master’s degree in Speech and Language therapy and would be about to embark on a fulfilling and worthwhile career. She would have gone on to make a significant difference to the lives of many. 
On the basis of Hannah’s dedication and passion for Speech and language therapy and the excellent feedback she received during her placements, the University of Essex has introduced an award for outstanding excellence in clinical placements in her memory. It will be named the ‘Hannah Witheridge Award for Clinical Excellence’. Hannah will be the first recipient. As a family, we are touched by this beautiful tribute to Hannah as the hard working, dedicated young woman that she was. 
The past year has served as an unimaginably impossible time for our family. We have found the trial process extremely difficult and our trips out to Thailand, to attend court, made for particularly distressing experiences.
We found listening to proceedings very challenging and we have had to endure a lot of painful and confusing information. We now need time, as a family, to digest the outcome of the trial and figure out the most appropriate way to tell our story.”
 

CORNERED BRIAN GOUDIE STRIKES BACK IN PATTAYA AND BANGKOK

$
0
0
'AH HAVING YOUS ARRESTED' FOR CONTEMPT!


Thailand’s most famous fake barrister Brian Goudie, who is appealing a 3 year jail sentence for fraud and embezzlement, just can’t give up his chosen mythical career and his boasting onm the net how he is now taking further charges against his enemies for contempt of court.

The offence they have committed is, he says, publishing his arrest warrant on the internet. No that’s not the arrest warrant for posing as a barrister to cheat a 78-year-old American woman out of US$300,000 – it’s one for a number of other charges, one of which is ‘revenge porn’.

On his new Facebook page he writes: 

‘Busy, busy, busy, now what did we do today?  Filed charges for contempt of court in Pattaya Court. Done.  File charges for contempt of court in Bangkok. Done.
Translate posts for computer crimes cases against the wee nyaff. Done.
Copy documents for summonses. Done.
Wheeeeeeeeeeee
I guess it’s my turn to go hunting.’

The Thai Justice system has so far failed to deal with Goudie, who was jailed in Australia under Goldie, the name he was born with in Falkirk, Scotland. But then again every dog has his day.  

There appears to be an arrest warrant still current. And he still has to face charges for ripping off two Brits and a German property buyer in Pattaya.

He has been getting away with his crimes because of course Pattaya Police will not investigate cases of foreigners defrauding foreigners.

 I have a mind to nip down to Pattaya to enforce it myself.

Meanwhile he looks awful nervous of in this video of him lurking behind his girlfriend in Walking Street, Pattaya, during the New Year. I think he thinks he would be safer in a helmet.

KOH TAO MURDER AND BRITAIN'S POLICY OF APPEASEMENT

$
0
0
WE'VE SEEN IT ALL BEFORE

PAGE ONE COMMENT

The brave and shocking letter written by Laura Witheridge, whose younger sister Hannah was murdered with David Miller on Koh Tao in Thailand, has as predicted caused a rumpus in Britain with just about every major media outlet covering the story – from the red tops to the heavies, from Sky to the BBC.

The reaction from Thailand has so far been muted. The Government could keep quiet while continuing to express sympathy - the best course. 

It could retaliate with anger and scorn and counter claim, the most common course when it is under accusation, or the authorities could simply say nothing.

The Thai media has remained muted, but it’s early days.

Laura has since muted her letter slightly without giving a reason. The quote from an unnamed Thai saying: ‘Why are you so bothered?  You can just go home and make another one,” and other quotes like this have gone.  Why? Perhaps she thought they were over the top.





But what she wrote on Facebook, judging by the reaction was not only brave but reflected the unspoken views of thousands.
The-SUN

‘Unspoken?’ The fact is that correspondents in Thailand rarely cover the darker side in Thailand until cases like Hannah come to the fore, and in many ways as a foreign correspondent based out of Thailand for 25 years I was forced to by circumstance coupled with my horror at what was really happening in the crime world in Thailand to tackle it head on myself.




Internet brought changes that meant that I could no longer operate as an independent (freelance) journalist flying the flag of conveniences of  ‘The Times’ and ‘London Evening Standard’ for whom I was the accredited correspondent. In journalism to have a realistic income working this way it was always necessary to sell the same story or investigation on several continents.  


Daily Express



The net put paid to that.

While foreign correspondents preferred to remain somewhat lofty writing on world issues, which of course I had to as well, and plunging to the depths writing about crime and criminals often to me appeared to be beneath them.



This reminded me of course of the film ‘The Paper’ and in particular a scene where tabloid newspaper exec Henry played by Michael Keaton who. when working on a tabloid in New York is turned down for a job on the 'New York Sentinel' (New York Times obviously)  which 'covers the world, replied: “I don’t really f…g care. I don’t live in the f….g world. I live in f…g New York City!’   

Though his reply is a bit longer than that.





For all their sins, and there have been many, British tabloids at their best carried out ‘citizen journalism’ and I was in Thailand where lots of Brits were getting shot, clubbed to death, defrauded etc.

Now social media has taken this to the '‘enth’' degree and Laura’s voice is one which can be heard massively because now newspaper and television newsrooms have to watch the social media.




Apart from the severe doubts over the guilt of the two young Burmese for the murders there are other questions that still need to be answered. 

Why was Scotland Yard so keen to rubber stamp the Thai Police enquiry?  What were the circumstances which led to the Foreign and Commonwealth office 
issuing statements ‘from the families’ supporting the Thai Police investigation? 

And indeed how could they do that if British police were only in Thailand as observers, had no powers to investigate, and could only draw their conclusions from what Thai police told them?






Or indeed are we being lied to?  Did Scotland Yard and Norfolk Police in fact assist? They did after all send a Scenes of Crime officer along.  

And, if their findings were so supportive of the Royal Thai Police, why are the Thai police being widely criticized by DNA experts for their atrocious handling of the case?

Of course Scotland Yard has to co-operate with the Thai Police. How else can they nab British villains in Thailand? 

But the statement from the families was clearly pushed by advice from the Yard and the FCO was used as the conduit.


Norfolk Police pictire release - wtth the Witheridges
at coirrt in Samui
Should not actually the British government take a stronger line rather than rely on watered down travel advisories which hardly everybody, not least 23-year-olds ever reads.

Because, as Sue Jones, the mother of Kirsty Jones, who was raped and murdered in Chiang Mai  in 2000 says, the fate of Hannah and the reaction of the Thai authorities is all too familiar. 

Sue Jones also had to face one of those ‘impromptu’ press conferences. Chiang Mai police ran the investigation into the death of Kirsty. 


Sue Jones
It started as a shambles and continued in the same vein. 

Eventually the Department of Special Investigations had to take it out of the hands of the Thai Police, who, it is widely believed know who the killer was.

Sue Jones was continually reminded not to upset Thai feelings.


Said Sue last night:“It's the lack of respect and empathy that gets me the most and their disregard for human life, especially white women. We were promised the earth when there. But as soon as we left everything went back to normal“I can completely understand how Laura is feeling. I wonder how David Millers family faired when they were out there.”

Viewing all 810 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>